Thursday, September 13, 2012

Amanda Palmer - Everyone's Mad At Some Chick I Never Heard Of

This One.


Before looking at Facebook today I'd never heard of Amanda Palmer before, but this current pop culture spat highlights some of the points I brought up in yesterday's post.  Apparently she is a musician who raised a whopping $1.2 million on Kickstarter to record a new album. She used that money up, and now is asking if fans want to play with her (unpaid) during shows at various tour stops because she can't afford to hire any more professional musicians. I mean, it seems a little ghetto, but apparently the audacity of this has been getting her crucified by fans, musician's unions, and industry veterans like Nirvana collaborator-in-some-capacity Steve "Made His Career When Music Stores Still Existed" Albini.

The full article is here: New York Times , and Steve Albini's response is outlined here: Albini!

First thing's first: the unions. I suppose I can understand their outrage at something like this. Neither I, nor any of my friends I have or ever have had in bands have ever been members of a musician's union of which I'm aware. I can only assume therefore, doing no research on the matter, that these unions do not consist of a tight-knit affiliation of garage bands writing rock music, but more likely studio musicians, orchestra members, and freelance day jobbers. I get it. They're coming from a world where they're always compensated for playing because they're always playing with/for people who have money. Because they're used to this kind of treatment, they get pissed at people who play for free because they feel it devalues (both monetarily and otherwise) musicians in general. Like I said, I understand the sentiment. However, these people need to understand that they do not live in the same universe as the people Palmer is most likely reaching out to. They're probably not fans of the music, so they obviously would have no incentive to accept the job in the first place. Why then would they get incensed by an offer than in no way applies to them? The article states that Palmer can't afford the $35,000 it would take to hire the three more musicians for the tour, so they're basically complaining that nobody is being paid for a position that wouldn't even exist if nobody volunteered for it.

Think about it in other entertainment related terms: if a magician asks a member of the audience to come up and help him with a card trick, does anyone complain that the volunteer isn't being fairly compensated? After all, they're technically performing a portion of the labor that is necessary for the show to continue. However, that would be a pretty stupid thing to complain about because the volunteer is fully aware that they're not getting any money out of the deal, they're just doing it for the spirit of the event and to be a part of the show. The case is very similar here.

Moving on, its Albini's stance on this matter that really gets to me:
If your position is that you aren’t able to figure out how to do that, that you are forced by your ignorance into pleading for donations and charity work, you are then publicly admitting you are an idiot, and demonstrably not as good at your profession as Jandek, Moondog, GG Allin, every band ever to go on tour without a slush fund or the kids who play on buckets downtown.
This gets us to one of the potentially unforeseen effects of using Kickstarter I was talking about yesterday: apparently to some people, there's a huge fucking stigma attached to it. If you use Kickstarter, you're a pathetic, stupid, deadbeat musician pandering for change, and you need to get out there and be poor like all those obscure people he mentions at the end so that your band can be name-dropped by some asshole for street cred after you die in poverty. In fairness, Albini's Wiki page shows him to be a decidedly non-greedy studio engineer, but come on, would he be where he is today if he hadn't been getting paid with sweet sweet major label dollars while he was working with Nirvana, The Breeders, Helmet, Chevelle, Robert Plant, Fred Schneider, The Stooges, Mogwai, The Jesus Lizard, the Pixies, and PJ Harvey? It must have been nice to come up in the heyday of Tower Records when the Buzz Bin was overflowing and that rock star money was raining in, but things are different now. For a lot of musicians, the money isn't coming from the top down, it's coming from the ground up. Who the fuck is he to call somebody an idiot for cutting major label money out of the equation? God damn it, is this still rock and roll we're talking about?

This is another point I touched on in the other post. The Kickstarter money is raised and the album is recorded, but what about when it runs out before the tour? There's no company to borrow more money from, that's all there is. Don't get me wrong, $1.2 mil is a shitload of money, but its not like she put it in her pocket, she recorded a fucking album. First off, Kickstarter and Amazon take 10%, leaving about $900 grand. Out of that money you can be God damn well sure that plenty of studio musicians got their union-approved rates for the duration of recording. I haven't heard the album, or any of Palmer's music for that matter, but I'm pretty sure she didn't pull a bunch of jug-blowing hobos out of the rail yard and have them play backing tracks for nothing more than a hot meal, so let's get real. People got theirs.

So I can understand why spoiled musician's union members would get all self-righteous about this because they've never had to play for only beer before (as so very many of us have, so very often), and I can see why a guy who's spent his career on the receiving end of a ceaseless tide of big label cash would disapprove of someone getting money directly from the fans (you know, the ones who would have just had to spend money to buy the album anyway), but what I don't get is the reaction from the fans.

Why the FUCK would fans be pissed? Speaking as a fan myself, if Iron Maiden came up to me tomorrow and said, "Oy, mate! We've run outta pounds for our US tour. We need YOU to come up to a show and sit in on the drums for a few numbers. We can't pay you, but you'll get free merchandise, and you can get bloody well pissed with us all night! I mean really knickered!", I would rob a gas station and throw my great grandmother down an open sewer grate to get to that show. Are you fucking kidding me? How could a true fan be anything but honored to share the stage with their idols? Sure, its not as an equal, but let's face it, you're not an equal. You just volunteered, so what can you expect?

And really, that's my point. Amanda Palmer isn't riding into town with a paramilitary junta and taking slaves to play sax for her. She's not (to my knowledge) fucking over the contracts for musicians that are already in place. She simply ran out of money after meeting expenses, and tried to come up with a solution so that the show could go on. She's asking people to play. It's voluntary. If you're too good for that shit, go back to your first chair in the Sioux City Philharmonic or whatever and shut the fuck up. Nobody has a gun to your head. None of you rock pundits out there seem to remember the fact that there are millions of musicians out there at all levels who will never make money or be famous, and many of them may not even want to. But maybe they do want the thrill of playing to a large crowd for once in their lives and sharing the stage with touring musicians, so who the fuck are you to tell them they should be insulted for being asked?

And another thing: Weezer did this exact same thing a few years ago! They had a contest and put a bus full of kids onstage to play Beverly Hills or whatever that stupid song was. I don't remember any media storm about how Weezer was exploiting child labor on their tour. They even have a tour video in Japan where they do the same thing. Why was everyone cool with it then, but now its an outrage? I really don't understand.


Play it right, slaves, or you'll be sorry!



 
So all in all, even though I've never heard a single note of music from Amanda Palmer, I find the level of criticism going on here absurd. How these critics can sit in their ivory towers and pass judgement like this is ridiculous. If you're a union musician, you don't fucking know what it means to take on risk and self-produce a project. You probably just show up at the venue that pays you, play your parts, go home, and cash your paycheck (because you get a paycheck instead of wrinkled $5's based on the number of friends you brought to the show). So shut the fuck up. If you're an iconic big wig like Albini, granted, you may be a patron fixture of the rock scene, but you also are who you are because bands paid you with corporate money. Money that came from companies that have ruined brilliant musicians financially, and that to this day fight with armies of lawyers to keep song rights away from the very people who created them. How does that give you any moral leverage to call someone an idiot for cutting a few corners while you reference these obscure underground bands who "made it the hard way" from the comfort of your top end studio? So shut the fuck up.

And the fans... how dare you? Who the fuck do you people think you are? This band is on the road to entertain you! They're doing whatever they can to make sure they can play the songs accurately at the show, cause you can be damn sure your ass would be booing if they sounded like shit. They try to make ends meet in a way that's already been done before (Weezer!) but this time its a scandal. How dare they run out of money and ask for help! It makes you wonder why people would bother to dedicate their lives to entertain a bunch of ungrateful pieces of shit who bash you at the first sign that you're not some uber-rich rock star, but just a person making some tough choices to try to keep doing what you love. I'd like to see your asses out there on a 36-date national tour.

News flash: unless your favorite music is auto-tuned pop-country performed by minors, your favorite musicians are getting poorer and poorer. The time of the rock star is over. The time of super groups selling out stadiums is going to be finished within 10 years. You better get used to bands "pleading for donations and charity work" on Kickstarter. Get used to fans on stage, because without them there might not be anyone on stage at all. Trust me, when the "artists" from the Billboard Top 20 are the only ones left with the resources to make music that you'll actually hear about, you might be yearning for the days when Bill the fuckin salesman was up there jamming with Amanda Palmer.

So please, shut the fuck up.

10 comments:

  1. I think you misrepresent Albini's point. The thing is, despite your never having heard of her, Amanda Palmer is kind of a Big Deal (TM). She's already well-established and could easily mount a tour wherein everyone is paid fairly. Albini's point is that if she, with her current level of popularity, is admitting that she's unable to a.) record an album and b.) put on a tour without using kickstarter, a site whose purpose is to literally kickstart careers and creative projects (rather than continue to fund preexisting ones), then she clearly has no fucking idea what she's doing and is, thus, an idiot. And this is keeping in mind that Albini is a guy who _you_ can call _right now_ and have him record your album for a few thousand dollars. No wonder he's baffled she blew 1.2m (or 900k, but your estimation) to record her album.

    I don't think The Great Albini would have any issue whatsoever with, say, your band hopping on kickstarter or relying on unpaid musicians. But Palmer is famous. She's wealthy. She's even married to fucking Neil Gaiman, who might as well be printing hundred dollar bills with his typewriter. And that's the problem people have. It's like Donald Trump cashing a welfare check. It's just smells bad.

    Lastly, Albini may not be exactly where he is today without any of the bands you mentioned, but he sure as hell would still be a name. Frank Black didn't just pluck him out of the ether. The dude founded Big Black and Shellac, he fucking record Slint! He was a legend before the 90's even started.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh, and I fully admit that much of this is because Amanda Palmer is reaaaaaally fucking annoying, and a lot of people are just happy to see her get shit on a bit.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Fuck, I just read her response to this whole thing and now I'm even more annoyed:

    http://www.amandapalmer.net/blog/20120913/

    It's long, it's rambling, it lacks a point, it never addresses the fact that she has more than enough money to pay people, and she somehow defends her choice as being "a cultural decision." Ugh.

    Also, apparently some cities where they really want to impress people, they magically have the money to pay for accredited musicians. But other cities get random strangers, despite paying the same ticket fee. Which harkens back to an older controversy about her wherein she would show up and essentially just have a shitty band practice one night, only giving it their all in New York and LA.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, as I was saying in the post before this one, the true purpose of Kickstarter is in somewhat of a grey area. There are very few guidelines for what counts as an "artistic project" on the website, so I think the future will determine what people will consider what is legitimate use. Either way, we're going to start seeing a lot more of it.

    Additionally, someone just brought Palmers article to my attention, which actually references a piece by Albini himself! Given the fact that these are both analagous financial breakdowns of what exactly happens to all that money in these situations, I feel like he should be more sympathetic to someone taking an approach like this (independently wealthy or not) as he clearly seems to understand that a huge lump sum of cash is not what it seems in the industry.

    Here are the articles, if anyone want to read them:

    http://www.amandapalmer.net/blog/where-all-this-kickstarter-money-is-going-by-amanda/

    I definately recommend checking them out.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's not about being independently wealthy. It's not about the VERY fuzzy and highly suspect math she uses to break down her costs. It's about knowing you have a built-in audience. Knowing you can sell albums. Knowing that you can charge enough for a ticket to pay your musicians and still fill the house.

    Like Albini said, if weirdos like Jandek and GG Allin managed to make a living doing this stuff, while still staying true to their artform, true to their fellow musicians, and true to their fans (albeit, despite the occasional slinging of human feces at them), and all in an era before the internet, when getting your material out there required more than a facebook post, then sure as shit Amanda "LOOK AT MY ARMPITS" Palmer can do it.

    That's why people are pissed. Also, because they didn't like her in the first place. But mostly the first part.

    ReplyDelete
  6. In closing: "all those things can easily pay for themselves, and I value self-sufficiency and independence, even (or especially) from an audience." -Sir Steve.

    ReplyDelete
  7. IT IS Genuinely Very Useful FOR ME.I LIKE YOUR Put up Simply because IT IS Very Useful FOR ME AS Effectively. HOPING THE Exact same Best Operate IN THE UP COMING Times ALSO. THANK YOU!
    Executive taxi and limo service in Princeton,NJ
    private sedan providers in Princeton,NJ

    ReplyDelete